On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:25:36PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:23:19 +1000 > Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:17:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > fyi, I still consider these patches to be in the "stuck" state. So we > > > need to get them unstuck. > > > > > > > > > Hiroyuki (and anyone else): could you please summarise in the briefest > > > way possible what your objections are to Daivd's oom-killer changes? > > > > > > I'll start: we don't change the kernel ABI. Ever. And when we _do_ > > > change it we don't change it without warning. > > > > How is this turning into such a big issue? It is totally ridiculous. > > It is not even a "cleanup". > > > > Just drop the ABI-changing patches, and I think the rest of them looked > > OK, didn't they? > > > I agree with you. Oh actually what happened with the pagefault OOM / panic on oom thing? We were talking around in circles about that too. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>