On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:17:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > fyi, I still consider these patches to be in the "stuck" state. So we > need to get them unstuck. > > > Hiroyuki (and anyone else): could you please summarise in the briefest > way possible what your objections are to Daivd's oom-killer changes? > > I'll start: we don't change the kernel ABI. Ever. And when we _do_ > change it we don't change it without warning. How is this turning into such a big issue? It is totally ridiculous. It is not even a "cleanup". Just drop the ABI-changing patches, and I think the rest of them looked OK, didn't they? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>