Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:40:18 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> > No-testing is the worst case.
> 
> Free software development can occasionally mean that system tests
> can also be performed by a person who is different from the
> initial programmer.

So ask someone for testing.  If you can find them and confirm that the
patch works, I'll happily apply.  If not, it goes nowhere.

> >> * How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates
> >>   by their change size (or software age)?
> > 
> > Irrelevant.
> 
> Do you want that I point any other patch out which you could find
> easier to handle again?

Only if they got tested and/or got reviewed by others.


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux