Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:33:45 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> > If *you* do introduce automatic testing for *your* patches,
> > then I appreciate it.
> 
> How would such a setting influence my trust level for your subsystem maintenance?

Give the test result before speaking too much.  It's already way too
contra-productive, just chatting.  Show the result at first.


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux