>> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked >> in reasonable ways? > > It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that > it worked. Can this aspect vary over time? > The test result should be mentioned concisely. How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures? > You shouldn't rely on my system. Did this system get sufficient trust so far? > The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable. It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting by positive review comments from other contributors (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes). Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
