On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:19:55 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > >> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked > >> in reasonable ways? > > > > It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that > > it worked. > > Can this aspect vary over time? Not really. > > The test result should be mentioned concisely. > > How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures? If *you* do introduce automatic testing for *your* patches, then I appreciate it. > > You shouldn't rely on my system. > > Did this system get sufficient trust so far? I can trust my system for my purpose. > > The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable. > > It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting > by positive review comments from other contributors > (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes). Yes. Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
