On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:15:27 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Because I didn't see any test result from you, > > This is correct so far. > > > > so I can't trust you. > > This view did not hinder you to integrate some of my update suggestions > which you found easier to handle. The really trivial things are different. Don't mix up things. > >> Which test configurations would you trust finally? > > > > Do test whatever like the users do. > > I find such an information too unsafe for an official acceptance test. No-testing is the worst case. > >> How can such descriptions improve the trust situation? > > > > It's the first step. At least then I can see you did some test. > > Currently nothing. zero. nada. > > I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this > software module. Then forget about your patches. > > How can I trust it? > > * Would you dare to inspect the shown source code adjustments again? Not unless you give some testing results. > * How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates > by their change size (or software age)? Irrelevant. Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
