Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> No-testing is the worst case.

Free software development can occasionally mean that system tests
can also be performed by a person who is different from the
initial programmer.


>> I am unsure if acceptable test results will ever be published for this
>> software module.
> 
> Then forget about your patches.

I published some change possibilities. Now the chances are varying
to receive constructive review comments for them as usual.


>> * How do you think about to sort the remaining update candidates
>>   by their change size (or software age)?
> 
> Irrelevant.

Do you want that I point any other patch out which you could find
easier to handle again?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux