Re: Future of Multiproto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Manu Abraham wrote:
> Steven Toth wrote:
>  
>> You did good things when multiproto was first discussed. You ran with
>> the project, you took negative and positive feedback and tried to figure
>> out the best route to success.
> 
> Still i do that, maybe hard for you to digest. You can see the changesets 
> for yourself.
> 
>> You were (fairly) positive and I believed
>> that building drivers on your framework changes was a good thing. The
>> group was noisey but the general feeling was that multiproto had merit
>> and would bring good things.
>>
>> That was in the past.
>>
>> Sadly, multiproto now comes bundled with too much baggage for me to
>> support it. The group is fractured and splintered, infighting is common
>> and multiproto (and the baggage/politics surrounding it) is part of that
>> problem.
>>
>> I tried to salvage the project a number of times but you can't find a
>> way to bring the patches back to the community at linuxtv.org.
> 
> heck, i don't follow the problem you are stating in here.
> 

There you go. It is on linuxtv.org now. Hope it makes you happy.

Manu



_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux