Re: Future of Multiproto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven Toth wrote:
 
> You did good things when multiproto was first discussed. You ran with
> the project, you took negative and positive feedback and tried to figure
> out the best route to success.

Still i do that, maybe hard for you to digest. You can see the changesets 
for yourself.

> You were (fairly) positive and I believed
> that building drivers on your framework changes was a good thing. The
> group was noisey but the general feeling was that multiproto had merit
> and would bring good things.
> 
> That was in the past.
> 
> Sadly, multiproto now comes bundled with too much baggage for me to
> support it. The group is fractured and splintered, infighting is common
> and multiproto (and the baggage/politics surrounding it) is part of that
> problem.
> 
> I tried to salvage the project a number of times but you can't find a
> way to bring the patches back to the community at linuxtv.org.

heck, i don't follow the problem you are stating in here.

Manu

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux