Re: [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Jonathan!

On 12 December 2016 at 01:14, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:35:42 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of
>> > dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message?  Then the
>> > rest of the set could go through your tree without touching
>> > driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable
>> > conflicts?
>>
>> So just patch 1 still for 4.10 through your tree? Sounds good to me.
>
> Yeah, that will work just fine, I'll slip it in.
Pushed the rest of the patches in drm-misc-next, queued for 4.11.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
Best,
Sumit.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux