On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:53:04 +0100 > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Not yet everything in this area, I still want to sprinkle nice docs around all >> the fence code. Especially some text to explain implicit vs. explicit fencing >> and how it's all supposed to work. >> >> But just cleanup in the dma-buf part was quite a bit of work, and I'd like to >> get feedback on that before moving on. > > No complaints here - except that I had to go looking around to find this > 0/5 posting explaining what the overall goal was...:) > > It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs > together in a more rational way. Ok if we pull this in through gfx trees? Will miss 4.10 though, that's already finished and in bugfix-only mode. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
