On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:35:49 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs > > together in a more rational way. > > Ok if we pull this in through gfx trees? Will miss 4.10 though, that's > already finished and in bugfix-only mode. I've pretty much closed up 4.10 as well. Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message? Then the rest of the set could go through your tree without touching driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable conflicts? jon _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
