Re: [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:35:49 +0100
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs
>> > together in a more rational way.
>>
>> Ok if we pull this in through gfx trees? Will miss 4.10 though, that's
>> already finished and in bugfix-only mode.
>
> I've pretty much closed up 4.10 as well.
>
> Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of
> dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message?  Then the
> rest of the set could go through your tree without touching
> driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable
> conflicts?

So just patch 1 still for 4.10 through your tree? Sounds good to me.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux