On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:35:49 +0100 > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs >> > together in a more rational way. >> >> Ok if we pull this in through gfx trees? Will miss 4.10 though, that's >> already finished and in bugfix-only mode. > > I've pretty much closed up 4.10 as well. > > Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of > dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message? Then the > rest of the set could go through your tree without touching > driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable > conflicts? So just patch 1 still for 4.10 through your tree? Sounds good to me. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
