Re: [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri,  9 Dec 2016 19:53:04 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not yet everything in this area, I still want to sprinkle nice docs around all
> the fence code. Especially some text to explain implicit vs. explicit fencing
> and how it's all supposed to work.
> 
> But just cleanup in the dma-buf part was quite a bit of work, and I'd like to
> get feedback on that before moving on.

No complaints here - except that I had to go looking around to find this
0/5 posting explaining what the overall goal was...:)

It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs
together in a more rational way.

jon
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux