On 2019-11-09 9:36 a.m., Carsten Bormann wrote: > Strengthening the directorate review system (with the objective to > reduce variance in review quality and timing) is very well worth some effort. I think that we are in agreement here. My recent experience is that I could not get (timely) feedback from the reviewers as to whether or not they were happy with the changes. I think that this is a chronic situation, so the ADs have learnt that a negative review doesn't mean much if there has been a revision to the document since. So they go ahead anyway, and then the AD winds up redoing the review, and being uncertain if the WG actually thought about the review comments and proceeded anyway. This is a serious commitment by the reviewers; that's why I want better acknowledgment for them. (And I'm not worried about the way that John and John about having too many categories)
Attachment:
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
