Le 04/09/2019 à 20:29, Shyamaprasad Bandyopadhyay a écrit :
I should have been little more careful.
I saw the upper part of the graph crossing
800000 mark. I thought that might
be the current state. Well, it may be
somewhere in between 700000 &
800000, but not very much away from the
800000 mark.
Thanks, it was just some thought.
The yearly growth rate seems indeed to increase (+30k in 2010, and then
+30, 50, 50, 50, 40, 40, 60, 90, 40) making think it may reach 800000
before end of year 2020, but not now. That's why I reacted to the
800000 mark you posted.
These are "BGP routing table entries examined" excerpts from the "Weekly
Routing Table Report" reported on nanog email list.
[...]
12-06-09 287824
09-04-10 317715
11-02-11 345778
03-02-12 397625
31-01-13 443138
07-02-14 492404
30-01-15 535593
05-02-16 579829
27-01-17 630069
07-11-18 724058
30-08-19 768323
Alex
Thanks for your correction.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019, 19:13 Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le 04/09/2019 à 13:46, shyam bandyopadhyay a écrit :
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019, Masataka Ohta
> <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
>
> shyam bandyopadhyay wrote:
>
> Welcome back.
>
> True, and rfc2374, though obsoleted, shows a very good
> way to do so.
>
> Though the rfc limit the number of global routing table
> entries 8k, which many people says too restrictive,
> we must make the number below reasonably small constant,
> anyway.
>
> BGP report (https://bgp.potaroo.net) shows
> number of entries in the routing table
> has crossed 800000 mark.
Has it?
Last time I checked it was in the 700k ball mark.
Alex
>
> Solution for site multihoming will give some relief,
> then it will start growing again. I guess something
> has to be done to restrict this growth.
>
> Thanks.
