Le 04/09/2019 à 23:56, Warren Kumari a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:55 PM Scott Weeks <surfer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- shyamb1966@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Shyamaprasad Bandyopadhyay <shyamb1966@xxxxxxxxx>
I should have been little more careful.
I saw the upper part of the graph crossing
800000 mark. I thought that might
be the current state. Well, it may be
somewhere in between 700000 &
800000, but not very much away from the
800000 mark.
------------------------------------------------
Just as an FYI...
Telia at 11am 9/4/2019 HST (-10 GMT): 756902
scott
.... and averaging across all Route Views collectors that are sending
what could be considered full tables[0], we get 758108... but this
isn't actually a useful metric - it doesn't reflect, well, anything...
More useful are the metrics are the "Active BGP Entries" graphs like
https://bgp.potaroo.net/as6447/
But, then again, this also isn't really a particularly useful metric
-- a more useful metric is "Does the total number of routes *that I
need* actually fit in the equipment *that I actually have*" - anything
else is just counting angels on a pin.
Yes, I'd like it if my cisco AGS+ could still take multiple full
feeds, but then again I'd also like it if my Commodore 64[1] could
stream 4K Netflix -- the world has changed, and tables grow, etc.
W
[0]: sshpass -p rviews ssh rviews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "show ip bgp sum"
| awk '/Neighbor/{f=1}f' | awk '{print $10}' | egrep '^\d{6}' | egrep
'^[678]' | awk 'BEGIN {sum=0;cnt=0} ; {sum+=$1;cnt++} END {print
sum/cnt}'
[0]: Actually ZX Spectrum, but very few people know what those are...
ZX Spectrum was a home computer. I dont see what it has to do with full
tables, because it was not connected to the Internet.
Or maybe its RAM being 64k means that a full table is 64k, and that is
what is sent by all Route Views collectors?
Alex
