Re: Why do we need to go with 128 bits address space ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Warren Kumari wrote:

.... and averaging across all Route Views collectors that are sending
what could be considered full tables[0], we get 758108... but this
isn't actually a useful metric - it doesn't reflect, well, anything...
More useful are the metrics are the "Active BGP Entries" graphs like
https://bgp.potaroo.net/as6447/

It is useless to discuss the exact number only to waste ML BW.

What's important is that the number is increasing and the increase is
accelerating.

> the world has changed, and tables grow, etc.

The important change is that Moore's law is ending.

						Masataka Ohta




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux