Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * There should be some way of evaluating this experiment to see how well it
> works (for both WG members and others). e.g. run a survey of both WG list
> members and participants and see how well it worked for them. (Two things I
> will wonder are whether these meetings were productive for those who
> attended, and also whether the meetings were sufficiently visible and
> accessible for those who didn't attend.)
That implies we have to work out what the goals are.
Let me take a stab at this:
1) make it easier to bring new work to the IETF.
2) permit deeper and faster review of the new work, providing better
feedback.
3) reduce presentations from costly in-person meetings
It would be nice to have a before/after analysis. A key metric I'd want to
have is time between individual-00 draft and adoptedwg-00 document.
A different metric would be how many non-authors are engaged prior to
and during adoption call.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
