On Mar 6, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think we need an
IESG statement, for either of these actions.
The implication of this is that a person who doesn't
want to be photographed would face two situations: one in which
the photographer approaches them and asks to take a picture, and
one in which the photographer does not ask before taking the
picture.
In the former case, the photographer's question may
be unwelcome; your proposal would therefore require that all
IETF attendees, whether they welcome such questions or not, be
prepared to field them as many times as necessary during an IETF
meeting.
In the latter case, the person who was photographed
without consent would have to confront the photographer and
request that their pictures be deleted; the photographer would
be under no obligation to do so. Presumably the photographer
would now be on notice that subsequent pictures would be
unwelcome; assuming good will on the part of the photographer,
this requires the photographer to remember, by face, every
person who has asked them not to take pictures of them.
Do you agree that this is what you are asking for?
Do you still believe that this is a reasonable way to address
the problem?
