Re: Proposed Photography Policy

Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> · Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:28:08 -0600



    On 3/2/18 1:09 PM, Joel M. Halpern
      wrote:

    
    I
      would note that for transparency, when our leadership is
      performing their roles as leaders, they ahve to expect to be
      photographed.  That includes at least the IAB, the IESG, and our
      WG Chairs.
      

      I also think that photographing presenters is something we should
      allow as expected behavior (without harassing the presenter or
      disrupting the presentation.)
      

    Do you have an issue with a statement of: "Specifically, photographs of
    panels and the like (e.g., the IESG/IAB plenary) are expected to
    contain all individuals regardless of labelling"?

    
      I would want to be clear that as far as official actions, while we
      will endevour to respect preferences, mistakes will sometimes be
      made.  And they may not be detectable afterwards (if the picture
      does not include the badge.)  We should be careful not to create
      an expectation that we will do the impossible.
    
    
    Would you be okay addressing this with language of the form "it
      is a best effort service and some mistakes will likely be made,
      perhaps because someone's label is not noticed or visible.
      Individuals can contact XXX to arrange for redaction of their
      images, or YYY to report abuse"?
    /a