On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:33 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I also much prefer the MHonArc archives and would not like to see it go away. >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> It would be good to capture/report any issues you have with the new tool so >>> that it can be addressed before the old archives go away. The biggest issue >>> that I've heard is yet to be address is speed to access/browse a WG archive >>> -- which interestingly enough I don't see in the open tickets [1]... >> >> I find it easier to follow email threads, the linkage between them and >> how easy it is to pick a single message out of the thread are some of >> the reasons for me. It's the visual access, so I haven't opened a >> ticket as I think it's not as easy to replicate. > > Major improvements were made in the last release, Have you looked recently? Yes, I use both somewhat regularly with checks on SecDir reviews to see if there are responses to reviews. I find it much easier to quickly see if there was a response and to follow the thread with HMonArc. I'll try again to see if I can come up with helpful suggestions on how to improve the interface and visuals. > > If so, and you still find the new tool lacking, pease enter a ticket. > > Russ > -- Best regards, Kathleen