On 15/02/18 13:47, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings. I got this update to an issue that I had opened about a year > ago: Add me to the list who would not like to see the mhonarc archives retired. While I do like the new one, I also often prefer the old one. S > > Forwarded message: > >> From: ietfdb issue tracker <trac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx, rcross@xxxxxxxx, rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [ietfdb] #2227 (MailArchive: User Interface): Lack of >> text wrapping makes MHonArc archive unusable >> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 05:32:57 -0000 >> >> #2227: Lack of text wrapping makes MHonArc archive unusable >> >> Changes (by rcross@xxxxxxxx): >> >> * status: new => closed >> * resolution: => wontfix >> >> >> Comment: >> >> The MHonArc archive will soon be retired. >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------+----------------------------- >> Reporter: paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx | Owner: rcross@xxxxxxxx >> Type: defect | Status: closed >> Priority: n/a | Milestone: (None) >> Component: MailArchive: User Interface | Version: 6.x.x >> Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: >> ------------------------------------------+----------------------------- > > Was there an IETF / IAOC decision to retire the MHonArc archive? The new > mail archiver still has some pretty serious faults for those of us who > need to skim WG archives by date. > > --Paul Hoffman > > -- PGP key change time for me. New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018. NewWithOld sigs in keyservers. Sorry if that mucks something up;-)
Attachment:
0x7B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature