It would be good to capture/report any issues you have with the new tool
so that it can be addressed before the old archives go away. The
biggest issue that I've heard is yet to be address is speed to
access/browse a WG archive -- which interestingly enough I don't see in
the open tickets [1]...
Lou
[1]
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/query?status=assigned&status=deployed&status=new&status=reopened&component=MailArchive%3A+User+Interface&group=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=component&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&report=27&order=priority
On 2/15/2018 8:51 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 15/02/18 13:47, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings. I got this update to an issue that I had opened about a year
ago:
Add me to the list who would not like to see the mhonarc archives
retired. While I do like the new one, I also often prefer the old
one.
S
Forwarded message:
From: ietfdb issue tracker <trac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx, rcross@xxxxxxxx, rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ietfdb] #2227 (MailArchive: User Interface): Lack of
text wrapping makes MHonArc archive unusable
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 05:32:57 -0000
#2227: Lack of text wrapping makes MHonArc archive unusable
Changes (by rcross@xxxxxxxx):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
The MHonArc archive will soon be retired.
--
------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx | Owner: rcross@xxxxxxxx
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: n/a | Milestone: (None)
Component: MailArchive: User Interface | Version: 6.x.x
Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Was there an IETF / IAOC decision to retire the MHonArc archive? The new
mail archiver still has some pretty serious faults for those of us who
need to skim WG archives by date.
--Paul Hoffman