If I read that with the voice of Sir Humphrey Appleby, it makes sense. Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Sep 2017, at 3:39 am, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear Dave, > > to be able to consider all considerations not yet considered and should be considered in potential considerations sections, would you please consider to provide a considerations draft for discussion. > > Mehmet > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Cridland >> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 5:09 PM >> To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: Considerations Considerations Section >> >> On 29 September 2017 at 16:02, Phillip Hallam-Baker >> <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Given that the solution to all problems seems always to have a new >>>> Considerations Section, I'd like to propose that all new I-Ds >>>> published have a Considerations Considerations Section, which >>>> provides considerations over what else might be considered when >>>> considering the considerations not yet considered in the other >>>> considerations sections. >>>> >>>> I believe this can only help us consider many problems solved. >>> >>> >>> All that the considerations sections do is to break out material that >>> has to be called out to the attention of different groups so that they >>> don't have to read the entire draft every time. >>> >>> As the IETF becomes more process driven and the processes make more >>> sense, this is expected and an improvement. >>> >>> >>> I would like to move to a machine readable IANA section at some future >>> incarnation of xml2rfc. >>> >> >> This sounds like a fine idea, all things considered. >> >> Dave. > >