On 29 September 2017 at 16:02, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Given that the solution to all problems seems always to have a new >> Considerations Section, I'd like to propose that all new I-Ds >> published have a Considerations Considerations Section, which provides >> considerations over what else might be considered when considering the >> considerations not yet considered in the other considerations >> sections. >> >> I believe this can only help us consider many problems solved. > > > All that the considerations sections do is to break out material that has to > be called out to the attention of different groups so that they don't have > to read the entire draft every time. > > As the IETF becomes more process driven and the processes make more sense, > this is expected and an improvement. > > > I would like to move to a machine readable IANA section at some future > incarnation of xml2rfc. > This sounds like a fine idea, all things considered. Dave.