Dear Dave, to be able to consider all considerations not yet considered and should be considered in potential considerations sections, would you please consider to provide a considerations draft for discussion. Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Cridland > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 5:09 PM > To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Considerations Considerations Section > > On 29 September 2017 at 16:02, Phillip Hallam-Baker > <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >> All, > >> > >> Given that the solution to all problems seems always to have a new > >> Considerations Section, I'd like to propose that all new I-Ds > >> published have a Considerations Considerations Section, which > >> provides considerations over what else might be considered when > >> considering the considerations not yet considered in the other > >> considerations sections. > >> > >> I believe this can only help us consider many problems solved. > > > > > > All that the considerations sections do is to break out material that > > has to be called out to the attention of different groups so that they > > don't have to read the entire draft every time. > > > > As the IETF becomes more process driven and the processes make more > > sense, this is expected and an improvement. > > > > > > I would like to move to a machine readable IANA section at some future > > incarnation of xml2rfc. > > > > This sounds like a fine idea, all things considered. > > Dave.