Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/12/16 10:01 AM, chopps@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I know for a fact it is not how I and my co-chair run the IS-IS WG. I
can't speak to whether other WGs are being run incorrectly. It's the
responsibility of the participants and the ADs to make sure the
chairs are not violating our own standards process though.

Well, I participate in working groups other than the ones
I chair and yes, there are working group chairs taking votes
and making decisions in meetings.  This is the way things are.
Ignoring how things are and hewing unreflectively to the ought-
to-be is one of the major things that got us to where we are
with NAT, among other problems.

Melinda





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]