Re: Unhelpful draft names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Unhelpful draft names
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:13:08 +0900
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <DB4PR06MB4571790D1D5EC7A0046DACCAD180@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> mpls encryption? I mean, dumb and dumberererer, right?

put the P into mpls-based v_ns

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: l.wood

References:
- Unhelpful draft names
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: Allison Mankin
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Unhelpful draft names
  - From: l.wood

Prev by Date: Re: Unhelpful draft names
Next by Date: Re: Secdir Review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc5539bis-09
Previous by thread: Re: Unhelpful draft names
Next by thread: Re: Unhelpful draft names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]