Hi, It's one of those three days in the year when we get hundreds of drafts announced in succession, which makes the job of deciding which drafts a person needs to read harder than ever. I have no idea what draft-xmss-00.txt is about and have no plans to find out. But it seems to me that we have a fairly strong convention that non-WG drafts should be named something like draft-<author>-<generalTopic>-<specificTopic> where the generalTopic is often a WG name, if there is a relevant WG. Now I realise we don't want to be too rigid, e.g. the author component is sometimes ymbk or farresnickel, but should we have a bit more enforcement in the tools, at least such that draft-oneWord-00 would not be acceptable? Brian