Re: Unhelpful draft names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> As Yoav mentioned, the authors are new attendees, and the work is targeted
>> to an IRTF group at that. I have an acquaintance with them and hope they
>> aren't reading this, but how do folks think this outcry about seems as a
>> welcome to do work here?
> 
> I worried about that before sending my note, but decided that an
> invented example was not persuausive. If there's a fault, it's "ours"
> for not making the convention a bit more apparent to newcomers. That's
> what needs fixing.

i would mention being liberal in what you receive.  but, as a staunch
naggumite, i do not believe that is wise in protocol code.  but this
ain't code.

and i think you were a co-author of the first or second draft-ymbk-...
(it's an old joke.  when megan asked us to insert the organisation name,
jon said "you must be kidding."  so i used that.)

randy





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]