Re: All these discussions about meeting venues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Sunday, August 29, 2010 15:59 -0700 Ole Jacobsen
<ole@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> John,
> 
> I agree 100% with everything you said here, execpt for the
> part about "we don't get it". I don't think I need to go over
> again why  Maastricht was chosen nor elaborate further on the
> surprises we encountered onsite, so let's just say that we
> will try to do better next time and move on.

I am really uninterested in discussing the Maastricht situation
further except insofar as I think there are lessons in it that
have not been absorbed yet.

I would feel much more confident about who does and does not
"get it" were it not for Ray's little survey equating Maastricht
and Minneapolis.  If that difference (fairly significant
international airport with good connections from several others,
easy and fairly quick transport from airport to hotel, in-hotel
meeting in hotel large enough to accommodate most of us, several
other hotels within easy walking distance, a large variety of
nearby eating places, ... versus "none of the above") wasn't
painfully clear long before the survey was sent out, then
_someone_ doesn't get it.

    john



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]