On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Lixia Zhang wrote: > Call me an idealist:), I personally believe, generally speaking, it > is better to put everything on the table, rather than partial info, > between nomcom and confirming body. > > Step up a level: wonder where this discussion is leading to? > Exactly how to revise 3777? It sounds like you would rather get rid of the nomcom and have the confirming body do the work from the start. I have heard it said that the IETF, in the most recent discussion that failed up update that portion of what we now call 3777, had a 90/10 consensus and didn't come to a perfect consensus. I think we have to say what the role and reach of the confirming body is, which may require us to think hard about what it means to have "rough consensus". _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf