Fred Baker wrote: > are confidential to the nomcom. For example, every question including > a new "do you have anything else you would like to add" question > needs to have two slots, one confidential to the nomcom and one > confidential to the nomcom plus the confirming body. How about something even simpler: The form is not confidential. If a candidate feels the need to share something confidential, they submit it separately and clearly marked. And in order to make the confidentiality issue more concrete (ie, real) would folks offer some examples of what falls under it. Obviously I'm not asking about a traceable example, but something that moves this from a theoretical exercise to something where the community can agree it really is worth the effort to maintain confidentiality. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf