Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Fred Baker wrote:
> are confidential to the nomcom. For example, every question including  
> a new "do you have anything else you would like to add" question  
> needs to have two slots, one confidential to the nomcom and one  
> confidential to the nomcom plus the confirming body.


How about something even simpler:

The form is not confidential.  If a candidate feels the need to share something 
confidential, they submit it separately and clearly marked.

And in order to make the confidentiality issue more concrete (ie, real) would 
folks offer some examples of what falls under it.  Obviously I'm not asking 
about a traceable example, but something that moves this from a theoretical 
exercise to something where the community can agree it really is worth the 
effort to maintain confidentiality.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]