RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > There is an expectation that the information provided to the
> > nominating committee is confidential.  The confirming body 
> > needs some
> > information to determine whether the candidate fits the stated  
> > requirements.
> 
> There is a simple solution to that. The nomcom asks the candidates a  
> number of questions. A new form needs to be developed that informs  
> the candidate that the information given will be available to the  
> confirming bodies, and gives the candidate a way to say things that  
> are confidential to the nomcom. For example, every question 
> including  
> a new "do you have anything else you would like to add" question  
> needs to have two slots, one confidential to the nomcom and one  
> confidential to the nomcom plus the confirming body.

I was on NOMCOM this year, and Fred's suggestion would solve this
problem perfectly.

-d

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]