Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
From: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:38:19 -0400
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20080316233002.0311a4a8@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The archives of the NomCom WG that generated RFC 3777 are now online:

http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-nomcom/ 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Thoughts on the nomcom process
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
  - From: Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Thoughts on the nomcom process
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Confirming vs. second-guessing
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
  - From: Ralph Droms
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Confirming vs. second-guessing
  - From: SM

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: draft-wu-sava-testbed-experience (SAVA Testbed and Experiences to Date) to Experimental RFC
Next by Date: EMSK key hierarchy and the DSRK
Previous by thread: RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
Next by thread: RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]