RE: Confirming vs. second-guessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > And in order to make the confidentiality issue more concrete
> > > (ie, real) would folks offer some examples of what falls under
> > > it.
> >
> > "I accept the nomination of area director.  The current area
> > director, Mr. J. Sixpack, has been attempting to impose his
> > opinion that beer should contain rice.  This is causing a rift
> > in the working groups within the area.  I would follow the area
> > consensus that we should outlaw rice in beer and thus my
> > appointment as new area director would achieve peace and
> > harmony within the area."
> 
> Why should such a statement be confidential?

Imagine it is complaining about an IAB member, and the IAB is
the confirming body.  That outgoing IAB member is part of the
IAB until the new IAB is seated.  That outgoing IAB member may
well take offense to someone thinking rice is unsuitable for 
beer.

-d

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]