Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
At 05:07 PM 5/24/2006, Vijay Devarapallli wrote:
On 5/24/06, Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ** EAP over IKEv2 seems like a more viable alternative: apparently > being proposed in 3G-WLAN interworking scenario as the access auth protocol. the 3G-WLAN interworking scenario is similar to an enterprise user gaining access to the enterprise via an IPsec gateway. a user who is subscribed to a mobile operator's services uses IKEv2 with a VPN-like gateway to access the operator's services. the mode is different. therefore I don't think this is an alternative to PANA and shouldn't be confused with PANA. we could discuss this more, but on a separate thread. Vijay </x-flowed>

Hi,

I guess there are differences in our understanding of 3G-WLAN interworking (and I could be wrong), but the point is that they (plan to) use EAP over IKEv2.

EAP over IKEv2 is used but in the remote gateway mode. exactly
like access to an Enterprise through a VPN gateway. please dont
confuse this with PANA for network access.

Vijay

We can try and debate the details offline, as
that is not central to the discussion here.

regards,
Lakshminath

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]