Joe Abley wrote:
On 14-Apr-2006, at 14:01, Kevin Loch wrote:
In case you (IETF) diddn't get the memo, the operational community has
flat out rejected shim6 in it's current form as a replacement
for PI.
I presume you're not saying that the operational community has rejected
all possible, future alternatives to open slather on PI, nor that the
vast majority of Internet users who are (for example) not served by the
ARIN proposal should never be allowed to multi-home.
No, I'm not saying that at all.
This policy change is about creating a viable migration path for non-isp
PI users before the IPv4 panic begins. Shim6 was seen as not doing that
even if/when it was widely deployed.
A scalable routing architecture that is a suitable replacement for PI
for end sites would be great. Please don't give up on that.
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf