Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14-Apr-2006, at 14:01, Kevin Loch wrote:

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'm not saying that these people expected the internet to melt down by supporting this policy, but that's exactly the problem. Within the IETF, we've been working long and hard to find a way to allow for multihoming that we KNOW won't melt the internet, and now just as these efforts are getting close to paying off (shim6)

In case you (IETF) diddn't get the memo, the operational community has
flat out rejected shim6 in it's current form as a replacement
for PI.

Given that it's current form is ante-natal, this seems healthy and constructive.

I presume you're not saying that the operational community has rejected all possible, future alternatives to open slather on PI, nor that the vast majority of Internet users who are (for example) not served by the ARIN proposal should never be allowed to multi-home.


Joe

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]