Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing.
Sounds like a rough consensus to me.
Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own paycheck get to blow up the internet.
I find this comment extremely offensive. Nobody in that room would have supported a policy they actually believed would blow up the Internet. Your implication that the participants were either uninformed or diddn't care about the consequences is completely off base.
Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in playground democracy has to end before people get hurt.
You would actually prefer ICANN replace the open policy process of the RIR's? ARIN participants are simply following the principles the IETF used to use: rough consensus AND running code. - Kevin (trimming the cc: list for everyone's sanity) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf