Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'm not saying that these people expected the internet to melt down by supporting this policy, but that's exactly the problem. Within the IETF, we've been working long and hard to find a way to allow for multihoming that we KNOW won't melt the internet, and now just as these efforts are getting close to paying off (shim6)
In case you (IETF) diddn't get the memo, the operational community has flat out rejected shim6 in it's current form as a replacement for PI. This failure of leadership from the IETF to provide a roadmap for a viable alternative to PI is a factor in the support for going with the current technology. - Kevin _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf