>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Brian> Reviewing procedures is fine. Reviewing specific awards Brian> isn't, IMHO, which is all I intended my words to exclude. Attempting to undo a specific award once things are signed (or delaying signing) is generally unacceptable. Reviewing a specific award to come to conclusions like "we failed to follow our procedures," is definitely problematic but IMHO sometimes necessary. Such reviews need to be handled with great care: some of the data used to make the decision may not be available to the reviewing body and much of the data must not become public. Also, if you conclude that you did follow the wrong procedures in a specific incident but are stuck with the contract because it is already signed, that creates all sorts of bad feelings and potential liability. --Sam _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf