Sam Hartman wrote:
"Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Brian> I think that is not really a concern. If someone has a
Brian> grievance that is serious enough for them to hire a lawyer
Brian> to make a complaint, no words in an RFC will stop them. But
Brian> the right words in an RFC will allow the IAD to say:
Brian> "If you have any complaints, please contact the IAOC." [I
Brian> believe the current words allow this.]
Brian> and the IAOC to say, very rapidly,
Brian> "We've looked at your complaint and concluded that it is
Brian> out of scope of RFC xxxx."
Brian> I don't think the current words allow that, because they
Brian> are very broad. We could fix this concern quite easily, by
Brian> adding Contract awards and employment decisions may not be
Brian> appealed using this process.
I could not support that change. I think it is entirely reasonable to
review a contract decision and conclude that procedures need to be
changed. I think doing so regularly would be very problematic.
Reviewing procedures is fine. Reviewing specific awards isn't, IMHO,
which is all I intended my words to exclude.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf