Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hmm. I think this bothers me a lot unless
a) unsuccessful bidders and their agents
and
b) unsuccessful job candidates

are explicitly excluded. Otherwise, every time
the IASA awards a contract or hires somebody, they are
exposed to public attack by the unsuccessful.

In general, people do not choose to raise a public stink when they are not hired for a job or are not chosen as a contractor, perhaps due to a lack of desire to air those facts in public.


But, if we do have someone who wants to raise a stink and/or waste IETF resources over that type of issue, I don't think that the lack of a formal review process would stop them. In fact, the lack of a reasonable way of dealing with this type of disagreement within the IETF context might lead people to take legal action, which would be even worse (more time consuming, expensive, damaging).

Margaret



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]