Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:26:13 -0500
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <p06200718be1419dd7c27@[192.168.2.2]> (Margaret Wasserman's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:38:01 -0500")
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

I prefer Margaret's wording but could live with Harld's wording.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Rough consensus? #425 3.5
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
  - From: Margaret Wasserman

Prev by Date: Re: One last word on operational reserves
Next by Date: Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
Previous by thread: Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
Next by thread: Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]