Re: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Brian> I think that is not really a concern. If someone has a
    Brian> grievance that is serious enough for them to hire a lawyer
    Brian> to make a complaint, no words in an RFC will stop them. But
    Brian> the right words in an RFC will allow the IAD to say:

    Brian> "If you have any complaints, please contact the IAOC."  [I
    Brian> believe the current words allow this.]

    Brian> and the IAOC to say, very rapidly,

    Brian> "We've looked at your complaint and concluded that it is
    Brian> out of scope of RFC xxxx."

    Brian> I don't think the current words allow that, because they
    Brian> are very broad.  We could fix this concern quite easily, by
    Brian> adding Contract awards and employment decisions may not be
    Brian> appealed using this process.


I could not support that change.  I think it is entirely reasonable to
review a contract decision and conclude that procedures need to be
changed.  I think doing so regularly would be very problematic.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]