On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 6:08 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps an AD sponsoring a BCP written by another AD is not the best way forward for something that has such a broad impact.
- Do you have a proposal for a venue where you feel this should be handled? Maybe you're thinking GENDISPATCH? I don't think this warrants its own working group, but weirder things have happened.
Yes it should go through a dispatch.
I just sent it to GENDISPATCH. Feel free to chime in over there. I did originally post the work to that group when this effort was started, so they are at least already aware of it.
- I also wouldn't characterize this thread overall as "pushback", but rather a lot of background and reasonable feedback, some of which has resulted in changes to the text. I also wouldn't say it has consensus yet, but so goes the process.
Out of curiosity, which consensus and how do you tell?
Assuming GENDISPATCH doesn't make some other recommendation, then as with any AD-sponsored document, the sponsoring AD is on the hook for determining consensus and then ensuring the author(s) properly record it.
-MSK
