> ... > >> My point is just that IETF should accept the operational reality >> that IPv6 is not and will not be deployed so widely, with reasons, >> to reach the critical mass and deployment schemes today require >> NAT, we should abandon IPv6 and live with IPv4 and NAT. > > https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html - total IPv6 at Google 32.41% Perhaps a better lithmus test would be: "Would an end-user notice if IPv6 was removed from his/her/it's host?" O.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
